The internet is overjoyed when the boss forces the employee to work on Thanksgiving | Wbactive

A post about an employee who quit his job after being told he could no longer take the Thanksgiving vacation days he had booked has gone viral on Reddit, where it received 147,000 upvotes.

In a post shared on Reddit’s Antiwork subforum, user bearandthebunny shared a screenshot of a text exchange with his employer, known as Matt. The user was reportedly told via text message that they “have to” work Thanksgiving Day and the next day due to “a planning nightmare” as another worker (Megan) would be away.

When the user replied, “I’m already approved to take off 12-11pm this weekend,” Matt wrote, “Things have changed, I’ve scheduled you for the 24th in the morning and the 25th in the afternoon.”

The user then said, “I’m not coming in on Thanksgiving,” to which Matt reportedly replied, “It’s non-negotiable, there are no other options. If you want to continue working here, you need to work on the 24th and 25th. “

The original poster replied: “I guess I stopped then, I won’t be coming in tonight [the peace sign with two fingers]’ to which Matt said, ‘Please call me now.’

An archive image shows a person handing in a letter of resignation. A Reddit post about an employee quitting his job after a dispute over Thanksgiving holidays has gone viral.
iStock/Getty ImagesPlus

One of the top reasons people are leaving their jobs in 2021 was cited by nearly a quarter (24 percent) of respondents to a Pew Research Center study released in March 2022 as “not having enough flexibility to choose when to put hours in.” called. Other top reasons included “feeling disrespected at work” (35 percent) and working too many hours (20 percent).

Was the boss unfair?

Joe Mull, author and host of the boss better now Podcast and Founder of BossBetter Leadership Academy, narrated news week The employer’s actions in the mail — canceling his employee’s last-minute vacation and “commissioning work” — are an example of the “gridlocked, normalized inhumane treatment” that “has been present in workplaces for years and which workers reject in droves”. “

Brooks Scott, executive coach and interpersonal communications expert, said: “Yes, but it’s more than a matter of fairness. It’s about right and wrong within your own company policies. The ending makes for even less structure and more chaos.”

Thomas Roulet, an associate professor at Cambridge University who teaches human resources, career management and leadership at Judge Business School, said the employer’s behavior was “unfair and risky”.

Employers should be wary of frustrating their workers in the current context where they are already “quite demotivated and have multiple opportunities to leave and find other more attractive jobs,” he said.

Hasty decision to quit on the spot?

Mull said the employee “didn’t make a rash decision” and explained that the user “finally had enough of this kind of treatment, which falls into the category of dehumanizing”.

Dehumanization is “the perception and treatment of people in a way that ignores and diminishes their intrinsic value as human beings,” Mull said. In a work environment, this occurs when “workers are treated not as people but as commodities”.

In the Reddit post, “the company’s priorities were more important than those of the employee. That’s dehumanization,” Mull said.

Scott said it wasn’t like the employee was forced to quit because they had no other choice. Instead, “they decided to exercise their right after realizing there was no benefit in doing more for a company that wouldn’t do anything for you.”

Darcy Eikenberg, recognized career and leadership coach and author of Red Cape Rescue: Save your career without quitting your jobsaid news week that the employee should not have given notice via SMS. “They should have kept their agreed time off and continued to task the manager with problem solving.”

“By quitting or waiting to see if they actually get fired on Monday, they lose any access to unemployment or severance pay,” she said. “It’s no use reacting instead of waiting and speaking up when cooler heads prevail.”

Roulet said: “The employee’s hasty decision can be better understood in the context of ‘the great resignation’ and ‘quiet surrender’ – two buzzwords that still describe the current and widespread lack of engagement and motivation of the workforce at a time of high pressure Reflect uncertainty and inflation.”

Scott said: “More needs to be done to protect employees because not everyone has the ability to quit their job on the spot. Being able to do so is a right and a privilege.

“But unless we find a way to develop legislation against these practices, companies will still see more and more employees choosing themselves over their company,” he said.

Could this have been handled differently?

Eikenberg said the conversation should have been conducted over the phone rather than text from the start.

She said, “Many of us have never been taught a framework for when to use digital communications and when to have a conversation.” Thus, “the medium and the message are often disconnected in the workplace.”

Eikenberg said a live conversation initiated by the employer could have started with making themselves understood and then “asking a question, not a demand” to the employee.

The career coach said a live exchange “could have resulted in a joint conversation to resolve the issue,” e.g. B. when the employee comes in for a few hours or the user reminds the manager that someone else could be more flexible.

“If a team ends up being set up in such a way that one person’s availability affects or destroys the company, then that’s a bigger problem and both managers and employees should be looking for new jobs,” Eikenberg said.

There are always “bigger fish”

Several Redditors showed support for the original poster.

In a comment that received over 11,000 upvotes, NumbSurprise suggested that when the employer said, “Please call me now,” the original poster should have said, “No. Whatever you want to tell me, you can put it in writing.”

User grinberB wrote, “‘Non-negotiable’ rate again, f***o,” in a comment that received 9,400 upvotes.

User tooOddtooCare replied: “Actually him [the employer] was correct. There was no negotiation [winking face emoji]’ in a comment that received 5,000 upvotes.

MysticYogiP said, “There’s always a bigger fish.”

news week asked the original author for a comment.

Do you have a similar dilemma? Let us know at life@newsweek.com. We may ask experts for advice, and your story may appear in it news week.

Leave a Comment